Glossary – Words, terms, and the abuse of language.



ACADEMIC CAPTURE

When a corporation’s support for academic research orients the objectives and outcomes of that research towards the interests of the corporation or its industry. Academic capture raises serious questions about the integrity and independence of research while poten­tially contributing to the broader dynamics of regulatory capture.
BIG TECH

Tech that is too big. Also known as the group of multi­nationals from the tech sector who enact out­sized economic, political, and regulatory influence wherever they operate. Big Tech tends to share a belief that democracy slows down their “disruption” and is not worth respecting. It can refer to the FAANGs: Facebook (now Meta), Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Google (now Alphabet). Other firms include Huawei, IBM, Microsoft, Palantir, Tesla, TikTok, and Uber.


CULTURAL CAPTURE

Cultural capture is a regulatory capture tactic in which regulating agencies and officers begin to think like and share the interests, values, and vocabu­laries of the companies they are responsible for regulating. The revolving door is an effective and continuous delivery mechanism for cultural capture.
KEY OPINION LEADERS

In the case of, say, Huawei, key opinion leaders are the “former politicians, university professors, lawyers and business people” who can help nudge regulation or even legal proceedings in a direction favourable to them.


MEDIA CAPTURE

Capture of public discourse through funding of news media or through selective access to sources and preferential treatment. Other means of influence may include the judicious application of advertising dollars in directions that are useful and less pro­tected by traditional journalistic ethics, including branded or sponsored content. Media capture is a form of “soft pressure” that differs from traditional censorship or thought control.
RADICAL TRANSPARENCY

A cultural shift towards a default of absolute open­ness in procurement and decision making. Mean­while, Big Tech exploits the strictest non-disclosure agreements, or NDAs, and continuously cracks down on whistleblowers.


REGULATORY CAPTURE

When public policy and regulation are designed in the interests of private industry rather than in the interest of the public. Sometimes the tactics of regulatory capture are subtle, sometimes they’re overt, but the general result, to varying degrees, is regulation being written or applied to the benefit of the regulated industries themselves.
SELF-REGULATION

The idea that an industry should, for the most part, be self-regulating and enforce its own norms in accord­ance with delineated standards and practices, and be allowed to operate with as little government inter­vention or oversight as possible. In response to public criticism and demands for more oversight, Big Tech, having so far largely avoided regulation in many areas (see “Tax on Inno­va­tion”), routinely promises to step up its powers and mechanisms for self-regulation, in an effort to forestall the prospect of independent oversight.


SHADOW PUBLIC SERVICE

The increasingly substantial tranches of the public sector outsourced to private contractors, in parti­cular to consultancy firms. These firms, including many with strong industry ties, act as de facto human resour­ces departments, only without the same baggage of transparency or pay that comes with in-house public sector staffing.
STRONG CAPTURE

According to Daniel Carpenter and David Moss in their conclusion for Preventing Regulatory Capture, “strong capture” results in regulation that clearly harms the public interest. “Weak capture,” on the other hand, refers to regulation that isn’t as oriented towards the public interest as it could or should be, but isn’t inherently harmful. Most, if not all, regula­tory systems are weakly captured in various ways.


TAX ON INNOVATION

A term used by Big Tech firms when regulators propose to apply taxes on their services, even existing taxes already paid by all other players in their space such as Canada’s Goods and Services Tax. Big Tech firms claim that consumers will not purchase pro­ducts or services if they are taxed, or that it is unfair to the consumer to have to do so. The term is a particular favourite of Uber’s.
REVOLVING DOOR

Career moves back and forth between positions of influence in the public and private sectors. The revolving door increase the potential for regulatory capture through both a shift in default values and behaviours, such as cultural capture, and the direct manipulation of policy and regulation, such as judicial or legislative interference.


THE “CIRCULAR”

A rotation through the revolving door, in which an individual moves from the private to the public sector then back to the private sector again, bring­ing with them their knowledge from the govern­ment but more importantly their contacts. Signi­fi­can­tly, the “circular” is a career move not covered by Canada’s Lobbying Act.
THE “ENTRY” STAGE

A revolving door move in which industry execu­tives leave their positions to join or “enter” the public office tasked with regulating their industry. According to Stéphanie Yates and Étienne Cardin-Trudeau, because of public officers’ allegiance to their former industry, lobbying is de facto exerted, “from within.” The “entry” stage move is not covered by Canada’s Lobbying Act.


THE “EXIT” STAGE

A revolving door move in which government staf­fers leave or “exit” public office for a private position, whether to work explicitly as a company employee or as a lobbyist or consultant for a company or industry recently within their regula­tory purview. The “exist” stage is the only career move covered by Canada’s Lobbying Act.



ABOUT US


Regulatory Capture Lab is a new collaboration between the Centre for Digital Rights and FRIENDS. Together we are building a clear, research-informed picture of how decision-making works in Canada, to document the crossover between public offices and corporate interests, and to stimulate debate about power and influence in Canadian digital policy. Contact us at info@regulatorycapturelab.ca.

Research support for this project was provided by students from McMaster University’s Master of Public Policy in Digital Society program. Graphic art, typesetting, and micro-site by Michèle Champagne. Edit by No Media.


        



Read our privacy policy.


ABOUT US


Regulatory Capture Lab is a new collaboration between the Centre for Digital Rights and FRIENDS. Together we are building a clear, research-informed picture of how decision-making works in Canada, to document the crossover between public offices and corporate interests, and to stimulate debate about power and influence in Canadian digital policy.

Contact us at:
info@regulatorycapturelab.ca.








Research support for this project was provided by students from the McMaster University’s Master of Public Policy in Digital Society program.

Graphic art is by Michèle Champagne. Edit is by No Media.

Read our privacy policy.